<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20+ Questions to ask yourself before creating a new Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danharrison.co.uk/20-pre-new-website-questions-to-ask-yourself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danharrison.co.uk/20-pre-new-website-questions-to-ask-yourself/</link>
	<description>Simple tips and tricks to get the best from your website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:51:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.danharrison.co.uk/20-pre-new-website-questions-to-ask-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danharrison.co.uk/?p=313#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Well I didn&#039;t know that. It was my impression that search engines could read the html that holds the swf files, I&#039;m impressed that they can now penetrate the swf and read the text.

As for silverlight I&#039;m not convinced its gonna catch on, its just Microsoft trying to get in on the animation action. If i go to a site and it asks me to download &quot;Silverlight&quot;, I close the window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I didn&#8217;t know that. It was my impression that search engines could read the html that holds the swf files, I&#8217;m impressed that they can now penetrate the swf and read the text.</p>
<p>As for silverlight I&#8217;m not convinced its gonna catch on, its just Microsoft trying to get in on the animation action. If i go to a site and it asks me to download &#8220;Silverlight&#8221;, I close the window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.danharrison.co.uk/20-pre-new-website-questions-to-ask-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danharrison.co.uk/?p=313#comment-276</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s all changing though Julian, because I think read somewhere that flash sites can now be indexed.  I know silverlight definitely can so flash has got to follow suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s all changing though Julian, because I think read somewhere that flash sites can now be indexed.  I know silverlight definitely can so flash has got to follow suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.danharrison.co.uk/20-pre-new-website-questions-to-ask-yourself/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danharrison.co.uk/?p=313#comment-275</guid>
		<description>One issue I always talk about with clients is weather they want a Full flash site or a more search engine friendly site?

Not so long ago I designed a site that only used flash files, which isn&#039;t the most search engine friendly thing but they were going for the WOW factor for there existing clients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One issue I always talk about with clients is weather they want a Full flash site or a more search engine friendly site?</p>
<p>Not so long ago I designed a site that only used flash files, which isn&#8217;t the most search engine friendly thing but they were going for the WOW factor for there existing clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
